As we get closer to the end of preseason, and thank god for that, it comes time for rosters to be trimmed and time for coaches and players to get ready for another long NFL season. Before I continue with that, I do want to express my disappointment in GM Mike Holmgren. I understand Holmgren likes to do things his way and have total control. He's always been that way during his career. But the way he has treated Hall Of Fame running back Jim Brown is offensive and just disrespectful. Brown has been the face of the Cleveland Browns organization for some time now. Even when he passes on he will be the first person and topic discussed anytime The Cleveland Browns are brought up. Holmgren removed Brown from the advisor position to Owner Randy Lerner and issued an ultimatum which defines his role in plain terms, to show your face, sign autographs, be a mascot for The Cleveland Browns and Holmgren controls it all. Holmgren also had the nerve to want him to be present with him come time for the Ring of Honor ceremony that will be held this year. As Jim Brown said it, "one monkey don't stop the show" and "I emphatically do not need validation from any man". I applaud this decision and agree with Mr. Brown completely. As men we have control over what our legacy will be and what type of person we want to be. No one is perfect and never will be, but it you are a stand up person, respectful, do your job to the best of your abilities, and stand firm in your beliefs, especially of self, there is no award, no Hall, or Ring of Honor that will validate a man more that.
Moving forward, I do not understand the out burst made by Matt Leinart. As a former first round pick who was projected to be the future of the Arizona Cardinals organization, he has not been all that was expected of him. He has not proven himself to be a starter in this league. So much, the Cards are still begging Kurt Warner to come out of retirement to play quarterback again. He has shown no quarterback awareness, no ability to be precise in his reads, and definitely does not have the X factor the be a great NFL quarterback.
His argument of not being demoted is, his play speaks for itself. To some degree he has a point. His Qb rating is 110.3, he is 19 of 23 for 161 yards a touchdown and no interceptions. The key stat though, he's been sacked 4 times. Derek Anderson has attempted 53 passes and only been sacked once. Whether Leinart wants to believe that or not, that makes a huge difference during games with an attempt to sack ratio like that.
He also brought up that it must be something not "football related" that got him demoted. No, it's pretty much all football related. As he said himself, his play speaks for itself, and it hasn't been very good. Along with that, it's preseason, of course in position battles coaches want to see all the players they are considering, especially if it's to be a starter in that position. But in typical USC fashion, he thinks he is entitled to the job. He might consider the fact he's been a back up his entire career.
To be honest, he is what I thought he was, a great college quarterback. He has not shown me anything other than that. Until he does that's all he will be. So stop crying Matt. Don't pull the "coach doesn't like me" card as to why you got demoted. Here's a dose of reality, maybe, just maybe, you suck. Sorry bro.
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Thursday, August 26, 2010
More or Less
I woke up this morning with a numb arm and neck stiffness. As usual I did my normal warm up to get the blood flowing so my body can somewhat function close to normal. From the years of pounding I've taken in the glamorous yet not so glamorous game of football, I have nerve problems stemming from neck and shoulder issues. Now don't get me wrong I am definitely not complaining, I love football and that's what I signed up for. There are many players who face these same ailments and more everyday. Knowing this, the big money NFL owners still want to add two more games to an already long and grueling season. I have thought about this issue since it became a topic, and I see no other reason to do it but to enhance the almighty dollars they have already.
Following the owners meeting Commissioner Goodell expressed a great amount of support to start an 18 game season. Followed by another statement that the league is looking for ways to increase revenues. Seriously ? The owners need more money ? And of course, it's at the players expense. When will the owners realize they need the players just as much as the players need them ? Yes, they provide many things for players in the NFL. Financial security, able to play a sport we love in front of thousands of supporters, incentives, benefits, etc. We are thankful for that, and are grateful. However, do they truly realize the impact it has on our lives ? The impact on our family lives, being away from our children, outside drama and distractions, being targeted and possibly taken advantage of by people. And let's not forget the impact it has on our bodies. Although we train a certain way, it's to prevent injury and minimize the amount of stress our bodies take from week to week. Long term damage is even worse. Concussions affect our mental capacities. From memory loss, to deteriorating motor skills, and many athletes are dying from Lou Gehrig disease because of the toxic proteins that form from brain trauma. Soreness, numbness, bad joint function and the list goes on. The average life expectancy of a normal person is 77 years old. For an NFL player it's 55, that's more than 20 years taken away. That's 20 plus years a player doesn't get to spend with his wife and kids. Heavier guys like lineman only live to be 50 -52 years old. So tell me, what two extra games would truly do for the NFL, besides take an extra 2-3 years per season off players lives and cause the possibility for more injuries.
This would also cause more labor issues. Already there is talk of a potential strike. This will cause even more problems considering there is no agreement in place. The players union is already fighting to retain fair revenue sharing, benefits, and more. This does nothing but create more of a problem for both sides. And a strike is not where the NFL wants to go with this. It looks bad for one, two it affects the players as far as pay, and three it affects the owners pockets too. Sure, they could find second and third tier players to fill in, but will as many people who come to see Andre Johnson come to see Jim from the Galleria ? I'm gonna guess, probably not. To me that would be like going to the Miss Universe Pageant expecting to see the most beautiful, most fit, the highest quality women each country has to offer but instead I get Aretha Franklin, Roseanne Barr, and Rosie O'donnell. I could only hope they bypass the swimsuit competition. Either that or I'm bringing my own stash of Pepto. The point, is that the owners will lose money fast, from concessions, television contracts, and advertisement. Then everyone is right back at square. one.
Sorry owners, but the players are what makes the NFL what it is. Fans come out to see their favorite players and teams, not average or third tier players or businessmen sitting in boxes sipping 50-year-old scotch talking about numbers or how big their yacht's are. Adding two meaningless games isn't gonna take their revenue to any substantial increase. The owners should really consider this and be fair. If they are really concerned about the player's health and livelihood as they say, then it's a no brainer. The schedule is fine, the divisions are equal in number and balance. There are more than enough injuries happening daily than need be. Even with the Collective Bargaining Agreement still being negotiated, fans are still very excited about the NFL. I'm sure most of these owners are golfers, they should take the same approach one would take when being coached on their swing. Less, is more.
Following the owners meeting Commissioner Goodell expressed a great amount of support to start an 18 game season. Followed by another statement that the league is looking for ways to increase revenues. Seriously ? The owners need more money ? And of course, it's at the players expense. When will the owners realize they need the players just as much as the players need them ? Yes, they provide many things for players in the NFL. Financial security, able to play a sport we love in front of thousands of supporters, incentives, benefits, etc. We are thankful for that, and are grateful. However, do they truly realize the impact it has on our lives ? The impact on our family lives, being away from our children, outside drama and distractions, being targeted and possibly taken advantage of by people. And let's not forget the impact it has on our bodies. Although we train a certain way, it's to prevent injury and minimize the amount of stress our bodies take from week to week. Long term damage is even worse. Concussions affect our mental capacities. From memory loss, to deteriorating motor skills, and many athletes are dying from Lou Gehrig disease because of the toxic proteins that form from brain trauma. Soreness, numbness, bad joint function and the list goes on. The average life expectancy of a normal person is 77 years old. For an NFL player it's 55, that's more than 20 years taken away. That's 20 plus years a player doesn't get to spend with his wife and kids. Heavier guys like lineman only live to be 50 -52 years old. So tell me, what two extra games would truly do for the NFL, besides take an extra 2-3 years per season off players lives and cause the possibility for more injuries.
This would also cause more labor issues. Already there is talk of a potential strike. This will cause even more problems considering there is no agreement in place. The players union is already fighting to retain fair revenue sharing, benefits, and more. This does nothing but create more of a problem for both sides. And a strike is not where the NFL wants to go with this. It looks bad for one, two it affects the players as far as pay, and three it affects the owners pockets too. Sure, they could find second and third tier players to fill in, but will as many people who come to see Andre Johnson come to see Jim from the Galleria ? I'm gonna guess, probably not. To me that would be like going to the Miss Universe Pageant expecting to see the most beautiful, most fit, the highest quality women each country has to offer but instead I get Aretha Franklin, Roseanne Barr, and Rosie O'donnell. I could only hope they bypass the swimsuit competition. Either that or I'm bringing my own stash of Pepto. The point, is that the owners will lose money fast, from concessions, television contracts, and advertisement. Then everyone is right back at square. one.
Sorry owners, but the players are what makes the NFL what it is. Fans come out to see their favorite players and teams, not average or third tier players or businessmen sitting in boxes sipping 50-year-old scotch talking about numbers or how big their yacht's are. Adding two meaningless games isn't gonna take their revenue to any substantial increase. The owners should really consider this and be fair. If they are really concerned about the player's health and livelihood as they say, then it's a no brainer. The schedule is fine, the divisions are equal in number and balance. There are more than enough injuries happening daily than need be. Even with the Collective Bargaining Agreement still being negotiated, fans are still very excited about the NFL. I'm sure most of these owners are golfers, they should take the same approach one would take when being coached on their swing. Less, is more.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Blinded ?
On a normal hot day in Houston, I sit in my office and stare at the slight bit of humidity in the air. Which leaves me a bit puzzled. How is there a slight film in the air although the sun is out and only a few clouds in the sky ? Why can't the sun just burn off whatever it is in the air ? I am just as confused about the Houston Texans and what the decision-making process is there. I am befuddled by personnel decisions mostly. I do not understand what it is they see or don't see. There are obvious needs for this team and they have not been addressed. And it doesn't look like they will be any time soon.
The Houston Texans organization is very good. They have a pretty good reputation, a respectable and generous owner, and seem to have guys with "character" on the team. But Is this the reason for their mediocrity ? Is being a "goody too shoes' hurting the Texans ? I think so, and if chances aren't taken this will turn out to be an average team and organization. On the offensive side of the ball I think they are pretty set. Schaub has developed into a very good QB, they have in my opinion the best WR in the game in Andre Johnson. Owen Daniels is one of the top tight ends in the game, even coming off of an injury. The offensive line is good but not great and the running back situation has become better with Foster developing. I still think they need a real #2 wide out to help Andre. Kevin Walters is decent but he is more of a third WR than a #2, and David Anderson is definitely a third or fourth wide out at this point.
Here is where I am puzzled. The linebackers are the strength of this defense. Cushing is suspended the first four games, and that will hurt. The defensive line and the secondary are for sure the weak spots. Mario Williams has had up and down years, has been injured quite often, and has not been the dominating force as projected. He is the only real threat on the defensive line. Antonio Smith was signed from Arizona, but he has not lived up to the money he received. After that there is a huge drop off. The secondary is young, very young. Kareem Jackson is a rookie and Quinn is a second year player. Eugene Wilson has the most experience back there. The Texans did nothing to improve these areas of the team. Even teams that have been winning of a consistent basis still go out and find more players to elevate their team. Sure they drafted Jackson in the first round, but after that what's left ? Plus, he is facing a learning curve himself. They have no real depth and no real experience overall. Failing to address these areas could be the key to why the Texans finish 9-7 again. Yep, just as I predicted last year.
You have to take some chances in this or any other business. If McNair is wanting to win now as he says, then he has to go out and get players to improve this team. Even if they have checkered pasts, as strong as the organization is, the change of environment might help ! Don't just settle for what you have because the players here now are stand up guys. Last I checked morals don't win football games, football players win football games. Look at the Redskins for example. Haynesworth has been a pain in the u know what, but when he is right he is a dominant player and Shanahan knows that. So hell yea they are going to keep him.
The Texans have this philosophy of building through the draft. That's fine and dandy, but who is going to teach these young players how to play ? Eventually they learn on their own, but that's after years of trial and error. How do they know if what they are learning fits the way they play ? Every player has a certain style, and they have to implement that style into the defense in order to be successful. It's also up to the coaches to know what kind of player they have and know how to design and call the defense around them. Aaron Glenn and I were able to play both zone and man to man coverage. Coaches could leave us out on the island and not worry about us. Do you think that gave us an advantage ? I would think so. That's why an experienced player is always needed . Coaches can say what they what in the film room, but when on the field it's totally different. Considering how fast things happen, learning from someone who has been there is a huge advantage than just solely watching film.
In my opinion this is where the Texans are failing. No real experience and no real play makers or game changers in certain positions. They will always be a .500 team unless this changes. They have just enough to get by at this point. However, they will soon be left behind because everyone else around them is improving. And as the sun eventually will burn off the slight film in the air, I'm sure the Texans will come to the realization that certain changes have to be made and addressed. Difference is, the sun has time and it's hand is not be forced. The Texans are on a much tighter time-table and a solar storm is sure to hit if things don't change.
The Houston Texans organization is very good. They have a pretty good reputation, a respectable and generous owner, and seem to have guys with "character" on the team. But Is this the reason for their mediocrity ? Is being a "goody too shoes' hurting the Texans ? I think so, and if chances aren't taken this will turn out to be an average team and organization. On the offensive side of the ball I think they are pretty set. Schaub has developed into a very good QB, they have in my opinion the best WR in the game in Andre Johnson. Owen Daniels is one of the top tight ends in the game, even coming off of an injury. The offensive line is good but not great and the running back situation has become better with Foster developing. I still think they need a real #2 wide out to help Andre. Kevin Walters is decent but he is more of a third WR than a #2, and David Anderson is definitely a third or fourth wide out at this point.
Here is where I am puzzled. The linebackers are the strength of this defense. Cushing is suspended the first four games, and that will hurt. The defensive line and the secondary are for sure the weak spots. Mario Williams has had up and down years, has been injured quite often, and has not been the dominating force as projected. He is the only real threat on the defensive line. Antonio Smith was signed from Arizona, but he has not lived up to the money he received. After that there is a huge drop off. The secondary is young, very young. Kareem Jackson is a rookie and Quinn is a second year player. Eugene Wilson has the most experience back there. The Texans did nothing to improve these areas of the team. Even teams that have been winning of a consistent basis still go out and find more players to elevate their team. Sure they drafted Jackson in the first round, but after that what's left ? Plus, he is facing a learning curve himself. They have no real depth and no real experience overall. Failing to address these areas could be the key to why the Texans finish 9-7 again. Yep, just as I predicted last year.
You have to take some chances in this or any other business. If McNair is wanting to win now as he says, then he has to go out and get players to improve this team. Even if they have checkered pasts, as strong as the organization is, the change of environment might help ! Don't just settle for what you have because the players here now are stand up guys. Last I checked morals don't win football games, football players win football games. Look at the Redskins for example. Haynesworth has been a pain in the u know what, but when he is right he is a dominant player and Shanahan knows that. So hell yea they are going to keep him.
The Texans have this philosophy of building through the draft. That's fine and dandy, but who is going to teach these young players how to play ? Eventually they learn on their own, but that's after years of trial and error. How do they know if what they are learning fits the way they play ? Every player has a certain style, and they have to implement that style into the defense in order to be successful. It's also up to the coaches to know what kind of player they have and know how to design and call the defense around them. Aaron Glenn and I were able to play both zone and man to man coverage. Coaches could leave us out on the island and not worry about us. Do you think that gave us an advantage ? I would think so. That's why an experienced player is always needed . Coaches can say what they what in the film room, but when on the field it's totally different. Considering how fast things happen, learning from someone who has been there is a huge advantage than just solely watching film.
In my opinion this is where the Texans are failing. No real experience and no real play makers or game changers in certain positions. They will always be a .500 team unless this changes. They have just enough to get by at this point. However, they will soon be left behind because everyone else around them is improving. And as the sun eventually will burn off the slight film in the air, I'm sure the Texans will come to the realization that certain changes have to be made and addressed. Difference is, the sun has time and it's hand is not be forced. The Texans are on a much tighter time-table and a solar storm is sure to hit if things don't change.
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Mo Money ! Mo Money !
If many of you watched the Jets Giants game last night, I think it's important to realize what a tricky position both the Jets and cornerback Darrelle Revis are in. Without Revis in the line up last night, it's very obvious the Jets are very weak at corner. Cromartie played well, but besides him no one else showed they could make up for the loss Revis. I'm sure the Jets are now evaluating their options to get him signed, but Revis as well is probably doing some soul-searching himself.
Darrelle Revis was without question the best cornerback in the NFL last year. He definitely confirmed that there are still "shut down" corners left in this era of football. At this point he has out played his contract, but for the insane amount of money he wants based off of a deal done by the crypt keeper, Al Davis he and his agent need to use more common sense. This looks really bad for Revis. As a former player I do understand wanting to paid what you're worth. The year I resigned with the Jets I saw a bigger purpose than just being paid crazy money. I could have easily gone out to free agency and gotten paid by many clubs. However, I did not want to start over, I trusted Bill, and I knew we had an opportunity to do something special. Personally, I did not want to miss out on that. Which is why I don't understand the logic behind this hold out.
From what I've read, the Jets offered Revis a 10 year $120 million contract. And Revis is seeking $160 million to "take care of his family". For real dawg ? He can't take care of his family with $120 million ? How many families is he supporting ? Is there a supreme gold addition of Ramen Noodles out there that I don't know about ? To use the "I have to take care of my family excuse" as his reason is total bullbleep. How about this Darrelle, just be honest and tell all your fans, that pay your salary by the way, that you have fed into the hype, your head is the same size as the newly opened Meadowlands Stadiums, and your poo doesn't stink so you should be paid like it. At least we all would respect you more for being honest. Instead, you pulled a cliché statement out of butt and you want us to all jump on your side for your "family". I'm sorry but I can not do that.
It's apparent NFL clubs are taking a harder look at how they are paying players. There are some salaries that have gotten out of control. What Revis and his agent have forgotten is that you can't have the "daddy he got some more money I want some too" attitude. Clubs have different pay scales and guidelines they follow. You have to work within the confines of those guidelines. He can't just say I want this and expect to get it. No matter how good of a player he is, no matter how valuable he is to the Jets, all clubs have the same mentality. You can, and will be replaced. Sure, he can ask for a trade and but from my personal knowledge of GM Mike Tannebaum, they'll ship him off. The only problem with that, is will he sacrifice being on a good team and winning for being on a crappy team and being paid. It will be hard for him to get on certain teams demanding that type of money. What if the Jets end up going to the Super Bowl as predicted ? Then that may be an opportunity missed. We went to the AFC Championship in 98, thinking we would go back, we never had a sniff at it again. Those are things you can't get back, those are the things in life you don't want to look back at and regret.
No one really has leverage here in my opinion. A common ground needs to be reached in some way to get this done. Honestly, I think the offer by the Jets was very fair. It has many advantages, and even though nothing is certain it makes him a Jet for his career. I just don't see the downside in that. On top of that you are playing on a team that wants to win and will do what it takes to win. Revis needs to put his pride aside and leave his ego at the door and just play. He will be rewarded, the Jets have already assured him of that. What does being the highest paid corner in the league do for him ? It doesn't help him win. It doesn't make his career any better than it is or would be if he took less money. Ultimately, if he isn't on a winning team then he is just another corner to pass through the NFL. Now that's something to be proud of. Guess then you could put him and a professional groupie in the same category. Only he would be the highest paid groupie in the league. Karrine Steffans beware, your crown is in jeopardy. There is a new Vixen in the spotlight. I'm not certain of this but he has covered more people than even you.
Darrelle Revis was without question the best cornerback in the NFL last year. He definitely confirmed that there are still "shut down" corners left in this era of football. At this point he has out played his contract, but for the insane amount of money he wants based off of a deal done by the crypt keeper, Al Davis he and his agent need to use more common sense. This looks really bad for Revis. As a former player I do understand wanting to paid what you're worth. The year I resigned with the Jets I saw a bigger purpose than just being paid crazy money. I could have easily gone out to free agency and gotten paid by many clubs. However, I did not want to start over, I trusted Bill, and I knew we had an opportunity to do something special. Personally, I did not want to miss out on that. Which is why I don't understand the logic behind this hold out.
From what I've read, the Jets offered Revis a 10 year $120 million contract. And Revis is seeking $160 million to "take care of his family". For real dawg ? He can't take care of his family with $120 million ? How many families is he supporting ? Is there a supreme gold addition of Ramen Noodles out there that I don't know about ? To use the "I have to take care of my family excuse" as his reason is total bullbleep. How about this Darrelle, just be honest and tell all your fans, that pay your salary by the way, that you have fed into the hype, your head is the same size as the newly opened Meadowlands Stadiums, and your poo doesn't stink so you should be paid like it. At least we all would respect you more for being honest. Instead, you pulled a cliché statement out of butt and you want us to all jump on your side for your "family". I'm sorry but I can not do that.
It's apparent NFL clubs are taking a harder look at how they are paying players. There are some salaries that have gotten out of control. What Revis and his agent have forgotten is that you can't have the "daddy he got some more money I want some too" attitude. Clubs have different pay scales and guidelines they follow. You have to work within the confines of those guidelines. He can't just say I want this and expect to get it. No matter how good of a player he is, no matter how valuable he is to the Jets, all clubs have the same mentality. You can, and will be replaced. Sure, he can ask for a trade and but from my personal knowledge of GM Mike Tannebaum, they'll ship him off. The only problem with that, is will he sacrifice being on a good team and winning for being on a crappy team and being paid. It will be hard for him to get on certain teams demanding that type of money. What if the Jets end up going to the Super Bowl as predicted ? Then that may be an opportunity missed. We went to the AFC Championship in 98, thinking we would go back, we never had a sniff at it again. Those are things you can't get back, those are the things in life you don't want to look back at and regret.
No one really has leverage here in my opinion. A common ground needs to be reached in some way to get this done. Honestly, I think the offer by the Jets was very fair. It has many advantages, and even though nothing is certain it makes him a Jet for his career. I just don't see the downside in that. On top of that you are playing on a team that wants to win and will do what it takes to win. Revis needs to put his pride aside and leave his ego at the door and just play. He will be rewarded, the Jets have already assured him of that. What does being the highest paid corner in the league do for him ? It doesn't help him win. It doesn't make his career any better than it is or would be if he took less money. Ultimately, if he isn't on a winning team then he is just another corner to pass through the NFL. Now that's something to be proud of. Guess then you could put him and a professional groupie in the same category. Only he would be the highest paid groupie in the league. Karrine Steffans beware, your crown is in jeopardy. There is a new Vixen in the spotlight. I'm not certain of this but he has covered more people than even you.
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Selling Out ? Absolutely
Bob McNair, gentleman, philanthropist, businessman, family man. All the qualities every man acquires to possess during our short time here on this little planet. But what measures or decisions helped Mr. McNair become the man he is ? Where does his guidance come from ? In his business ventures what persuades him one way or the other to stay in a deal or cash out ? We don't know the answers to these questions, but his track record has shown a high success rate at doing it.
It leads me to wonder though if Mr. McNair is getting a case of the Lou Pai's. For those of you that don't know or have forgotten, Lou Pai was CEO of Enron Energy Services and Enron Xcelerator. Before the poo hit the fan with the whole Enron thing, Lou or "Louie", went all in and left Enron with over $250 million dollars. We know Mr. McNair is not leaving as owner of the Texans franchise, but with this latest move to fly to New York and hold a "meeting" with Roger Goodell puts him out there a bit.
We all know what's going on with Brian Cushing. We know the history and the excuses being made by him assuring us he did not cheat. Honestly, I hope he didn't. It seems like the facts, real facts, are against him. First, tumors caused the positive test for HCG. But according to Long Island doctor Gary Wadler, who by the way works for the World Anti Doping Agency, said "If he had tumors that produced HCG, he wouldn't be playing football. He would be under treatment for a malignant tumor. Malignant testicular tumors producing HCG are rather lethal. It is a fairly aggressive tumor and you're not playing in the NFL with one." Guess that kills that excuse. Next, we have "overtrained athlete syndrome". This according to Cushing and his "people", caused a hormonal spike which caused him to test positive for HCG. According to Mark Jenkins, MD, overtrained athlete syndrome consists of the following. Moodiness, easily irritated, depression, loss of desire to be competitive and enthusiastic, decreased appetite, weight loss, muscular soreness, and increased frequency of viral illnesses. Wonder if he means STDs ? Sorry got a little sidetracked. Also increased incidence of injuries, and decrease in testosterone. Now out of the 14 articles I read, they all were pretty much the same as this article. No where was a hormonal spike listed, in fact it was the opposite.
Which brings me back to Mr. McNair. Why would Mr. McNair, who I'm sure does his research, fly to New York to defend Cushing considering the facts that are stated by many other specialists and doctors ? I would like to know who these one or two doctors are that provided this information. And yes, before I go on, I do believe there are rare occurrences of things that happen with the human body. The human body is still not fully tapped in the field of science and medicine. So why is Mr. McNair willing to take the chance of looking foolish ? I think he realizes this is the year the Texans have a real chance of getting to the playoffs. And this is possibly a make or break year for Kubiak and Rick Smith.
After several 8-8 seasons and a 9-7 season last year, Mr. McNair can no longer stand mediocrity. He voiced his opinions about it last year, and has made it very clear this year. Him coming out from behind the shadows and doing something as public as this let's me know that he is tired of waiting. This is an example of him exhausting all of his efforts in order to help the organization. Even if he looks bad. He has always been involved, but he's never done anything like this.
I wish I was a fly on the wall in the meeting that took place yesterday. I'm almost wondering if some good ole boy whiskey drinking deal making went down. Kinda like the tv show Dallas. McNair is Jock, and Goodell is Cliff Barnes. The episode I'm referring to involves Jock wanting a plot of land for ewing oil, (playoffs for Texans) but barnes used funds (suspension), to stop ewing oil from getting the leases in order to drill. Jock was not happy and allowed Bobby to talk to Cliff, (Cushings people). But if he failed then they would do whatever they had to do, ( McNair flying to NY). Amazing how tv shows are so relatable to real life.
I see the suspension getting reduced to probably two games. Who knows what was said or agreed to during that meeting. What slanderous words were thrown around or blackmailing tactics were used. Or, maybe it was just a meeting of great minds trying to come to a common solution. As an important player for the Texans, is Cushing worth it ? Yes, he is. Only if he returns as the player he was last year. If not, then Cushing will be looked at as a cheater and a fool for sure, but Mr. McNair will look like the ultimate fool for believing him.
It leads me to wonder though if Mr. McNair is getting a case of the Lou Pai's. For those of you that don't know or have forgotten, Lou Pai was CEO of Enron Energy Services and Enron Xcelerator. Before the poo hit the fan with the whole Enron thing, Lou or "Louie", went all in and left Enron with over $250 million dollars. We know Mr. McNair is not leaving as owner of the Texans franchise, but with this latest move to fly to New York and hold a "meeting" with Roger Goodell puts him out there a bit.
We all know what's going on with Brian Cushing. We know the history and the excuses being made by him assuring us he did not cheat. Honestly, I hope he didn't. It seems like the facts, real facts, are against him. First, tumors caused the positive test for HCG. But according to Long Island doctor Gary Wadler, who by the way works for the World Anti Doping Agency, said "If he had tumors that produced HCG, he wouldn't be playing football. He would be under treatment for a malignant tumor. Malignant testicular tumors producing HCG are rather lethal. It is a fairly aggressive tumor and you're not playing in the NFL with one." Guess that kills that excuse. Next, we have "overtrained athlete syndrome". This according to Cushing and his "people", caused a hormonal spike which caused him to test positive for HCG. According to Mark Jenkins, MD, overtrained athlete syndrome consists of the following. Moodiness, easily irritated, depression, loss of desire to be competitive and enthusiastic, decreased appetite, weight loss, muscular soreness, and increased frequency of viral illnesses. Wonder if he means STDs ? Sorry got a little sidetracked. Also increased incidence of injuries, and decrease in testosterone. Now out of the 14 articles I read, they all were pretty much the same as this article. No where was a hormonal spike listed, in fact it was the opposite.
Which brings me back to Mr. McNair. Why would Mr. McNair, who I'm sure does his research, fly to New York to defend Cushing considering the facts that are stated by many other specialists and doctors ? I would like to know who these one or two doctors are that provided this information. And yes, before I go on, I do believe there are rare occurrences of things that happen with the human body. The human body is still not fully tapped in the field of science and medicine. So why is Mr. McNair willing to take the chance of looking foolish ? I think he realizes this is the year the Texans have a real chance of getting to the playoffs. And this is possibly a make or break year for Kubiak and Rick Smith.
After several 8-8 seasons and a 9-7 season last year, Mr. McNair can no longer stand mediocrity. He voiced his opinions about it last year, and has made it very clear this year. Him coming out from behind the shadows and doing something as public as this let's me know that he is tired of waiting. This is an example of him exhausting all of his efforts in order to help the organization. Even if he looks bad. He has always been involved, but he's never done anything like this.
I wish I was a fly on the wall in the meeting that took place yesterday. I'm almost wondering if some good ole boy whiskey drinking deal making went down. Kinda like the tv show Dallas. McNair is Jock, and Goodell is Cliff Barnes. The episode I'm referring to involves Jock wanting a plot of land for ewing oil, (playoffs for Texans) but barnes used funds (suspension), to stop ewing oil from getting the leases in order to drill. Jock was not happy and allowed Bobby to talk to Cliff, (Cushings people). But if he failed then they would do whatever they had to do, ( McNair flying to NY). Amazing how tv shows are so relatable to real life.
I see the suspension getting reduced to probably two games. Who knows what was said or agreed to during that meeting. What slanderous words were thrown around or blackmailing tactics were used. Or, maybe it was just a meeting of great minds trying to come to a common solution. As an important player for the Texans, is Cushing worth it ? Yes, he is. Only if he returns as the player he was last year. If not, then Cushing will be looked at as a cheater and a fool for sure, but Mr. McNair will look like the ultimate fool for believing him.
Friday, August 6, 2010
HOF In or Out
The Hall Of Fame is a special honor. Every NFL player relishes the chance to be considered one of the greats to play the game, and the Hall Of Fame puts you at the pinnacle of the sport. There has been much debate on whether to consider "off the field" actions as a criteria for getting into the hall. There are specific rules put in place by the committee that gives them a gauge on how to vote. So why the debate ? Why do off the field actions matter ? They don't, and never should.
The rules specifically state, "The only criteria for election to the Pro Football Hall of Fame are a nominee's achievements and contributions as a player, coach, or contributor in professional football in the United States of America." Although the statement "contributions as a player" is open and subjective, it does not pertain to moral standards. It is clear it's in regards to the game itself. That's why I think there is no debate. It's like trying to turn crystal light into Kool Aid. Not gonna happen. Plus Kool Aid is better anyway.
If the law changes and moral standards are considered as part of the process, then it allows players who were average or mediocre to be elected. Does the character of a player represent the NFL in some way ? Absolutely ! I agree with that. That shouldn't make him a Hall of Fame candidate. This is another example of how the governing bodies of our country are trying to turn all sports into the ultimate YMCA league. Celebrating mediocrity. Everyone plays, so no matter how good or how bad, everyone achieves greatness and are the same. Horsepucky !! There is a huge difference between greatness and just being good. What's done on the field has nothing to do with how someone chooses to live his life. Given my inside presence of the game and first hand experience, most of the players elected to the hall might not be in right now.
Commissioner Goodell handles the character side of the NFL. That's where it should stay. Professional football is a game of imperfect human beings with individuality. That is in part what makes the game so great. That is what allows some players to be great and some average. There will always be a player with some kind of an issue. Some are more public than others. If those players perform at a high level for a sustained number of years, does his character matter ? No. From the owner all the way down to the water boy, the only thing is expected is to perform on the field and win. Period. That is what fans want as well. Even though owners want "high character" guys on their respective teams, that's not the main focus. So when owners come out and use that as a PR tool to fans to have them come out, it's a semi smoke screen.
Another issue that factors in is that instead of being judged on concrete numbers and play, everything will be subjective. I love peanut butter Twix. The other person may love snickers. The snickers may be put together better, hold it's shape and not melt as easily, but my melted Twix is really damn good. That's my personal opinion. So I prefer the messy sloppy Twix. And that's how the debate begins. The selection process is hard enough as it is already. Throwing personal opinions into the mix makes it that much harder. Which is why the way they select players should stay how it is. This isn't a popularity contest, who cares if the player is a nice upstanding guy all the time. If the player clearly performs at a higher level than others, that is all that matters. It's not fair if a guy gets elected in on borderline numbers and charity work.
Hopefully the committee will stand firm on the way they judge the hall. The format is one of a few things that has some validity to it because there are actual numbers and stats to back up the elected players. We as a people need and want to see greatness. Those that are lucky enough to have the opportunity, can have something to strive for individually as well as collectively winning a Super Bowl. The nature of sports is to be competitive and achieve greatness. Not striving for mediocrity. What kind of message does it send if the Hall Of Fame, associated with one of the greatest professional sports in the world is filled with average players with so so stats ? It makes it just that, so so.
The rules specifically state, "The only criteria for election to the Pro Football Hall of Fame are a nominee's achievements and contributions as a player, coach, or contributor in professional football in the United States of America." Although the statement "contributions as a player" is open and subjective, it does not pertain to moral standards. It is clear it's in regards to the game itself. That's why I think there is no debate. It's like trying to turn crystal light into Kool Aid. Not gonna happen. Plus Kool Aid is better anyway.
If the law changes and moral standards are considered as part of the process, then it allows players who were average or mediocre to be elected. Does the character of a player represent the NFL in some way ? Absolutely ! I agree with that. That shouldn't make him a Hall of Fame candidate. This is another example of how the governing bodies of our country are trying to turn all sports into the ultimate YMCA league. Celebrating mediocrity. Everyone plays, so no matter how good or how bad, everyone achieves greatness and are the same. Horsepucky !! There is a huge difference between greatness and just being good. What's done on the field has nothing to do with how someone chooses to live his life. Given my inside presence of the game and first hand experience, most of the players elected to the hall might not be in right now.
Commissioner Goodell handles the character side of the NFL. That's where it should stay. Professional football is a game of imperfect human beings with individuality. That is in part what makes the game so great. That is what allows some players to be great and some average. There will always be a player with some kind of an issue. Some are more public than others. If those players perform at a high level for a sustained number of years, does his character matter ? No. From the owner all the way down to the water boy, the only thing is expected is to perform on the field and win. Period. That is what fans want as well. Even though owners want "high character" guys on their respective teams, that's not the main focus. So when owners come out and use that as a PR tool to fans to have them come out, it's a semi smoke screen.
Another issue that factors in is that instead of being judged on concrete numbers and play, everything will be subjective. I love peanut butter Twix. The other person may love snickers. The snickers may be put together better, hold it's shape and not melt as easily, but my melted Twix is really damn good. That's my personal opinion. So I prefer the messy sloppy Twix. And that's how the debate begins. The selection process is hard enough as it is already. Throwing personal opinions into the mix makes it that much harder. Which is why the way they select players should stay how it is. This isn't a popularity contest, who cares if the player is a nice upstanding guy all the time. If the player clearly performs at a higher level than others, that is all that matters. It's not fair if a guy gets elected in on borderline numbers and charity work.
Hopefully the committee will stand firm on the way they judge the hall. The format is one of a few things that has some validity to it because there are actual numbers and stats to back up the elected players. We as a people need and want to see greatness. Those that are lucky enough to have the opportunity, can have something to strive for individually as well as collectively winning a Super Bowl. The nature of sports is to be competitive and achieve greatness. Not striving for mediocrity. What kind of message does it send if the Hall Of Fame, associated with one of the greatest professional sports in the world is filled with average players with so so stats ? It makes it just that, so so.
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
Inner Workings
It's hot outside, damn hot. I've run, hit, and covered many individuals in this heat. That's part of training camp. It's not so much the physical aspect of it that makes it hard, the mental phase of it is what is key. For me being in shape was never a problem, I stayed in shape year round. Learning from veterans like Aaron Glenn and Shannon Sharpe, that is what it took to last in the NFL. This Albert Haynesworth debacle is very confusing to me. So instead of looking at the surface of it, I tried to look a little deeper. Going back to Albert's Titan days , you have a young man with tons of ability and athleticism. When motivated he is unstoppable. Yet he has been injury prone, mentally unstable, and seems to at times live in his own world. He hasn't played 16 games since 2002. What is his deal ? Is he himself a puzzle or just a puzzled human being ?
I'm sure if you ask any coach in the NFL there would be no question that Haynesworth is the most gifted D-Lineman in the game today. They would also say he is thus far the most disappointing one too. Throughout his career he only showed flashes of what he could do. but come contract time we all saw what he is capable of doing and the dominance associated with it. No one had a chance containing Haynesworth throughout this run. Even when he had to play a second season and attain many incentives requested by the Titans, he did that easily as well. Motivation ? Money of course. Did he help the Titans overall by actually showing up and doing his job ? Yes. Was he truly interested in the team ? No. That has come to light shiny and bright now. It's selfish, it's arrogant, and it's disgusting to watch.
Ok, has Coach Shanahan gone a bit too far with this conditioning test thing ? Probably. And that is only because he has blasted Albert in the media everyday. But to Mike's defense, did Albert not do the same thing to the Redskin organization ? He pretty much spit in the coaches face, Snyder's face, and his teammates face. Almost seems like he doesn't care. What he isn't understanding is that everyone is moving on without him. Although the team would like to have him, it's clear by some of his teammates responses they are working and preparing as if he is not going to be there. Seriously, Albert can pass the test if he wants to. I've seen guys with less ability do it year after year. No excuse. This isn't about the test, it's about Albert and yet another example of entitlement, and him thinking the world owes him something.
Think about it, he plays his way to a huge contract. He is being sued, he had an affair, the woman is pregnant or whatever, he complains about the defense changing and that the Redskins lied to him. Word ? Clearly he has not taken notice that the NFL is full of lies. Of course they will tell you what you want to hear in order to sign you. Catch is, once you're under contract that organization owns you. Especially for that amount of money. The other side of that is the black ball effect. He has been defiant of the change the organization is making. What happen to showing everyone you have changed Albert ? That it's not about the money ? That was all a lie, and part of your politically correct scandal to get paid. You're not interested in winning a championship, if that were true he'd still be in Tennessee.
Coming off of the 2003 year, I had 7 INT's which was the best year of my career. Dom Capers wanted to move me to safety to have more athleticism on the field. Now, I could have thrown a fit and made a spectacle out of it, but I didn't. Because it's not about me. It was about the team, and doing my part to help us get better. Nothing more.So I made the move. Does it mean I liked it or felt indifferent about the situation ? No, it doesn't. I was only one small part of the over all goal. Individual pride has a small place in team sports. Very small. Doesn't matter how much money you make, or how talented you are, when it comes down to it, the team comes first.
This is a much deeper issue that only Albert can figure out. Something inside of him that gives him the idea or justifies that he can act this way. All players want to achieve individual success, that is what makes some greater than others. Not to the point where it comes before teammates. He has to take an introspective point of view. He really needs to decide if this is what he wants to do. Right now he seems a little confused at life. So me personally I'm not gonna pass judgment on him, It's not my place. He does need to nip this in the bud quickly and save face for himself. The team will move on, the organization will move on and he will be forgotten. He will only be brought up in conversations of those that got paid and quit. So Albert, is that what you want your legacy to be ? A failure, a quitter.
I'm sure if you ask any coach in the NFL there would be no question that Haynesworth is the most gifted D-Lineman in the game today. They would also say he is thus far the most disappointing one too. Throughout his career he only showed flashes of what he could do. but come contract time we all saw what he is capable of doing and the dominance associated with it. No one had a chance containing Haynesworth throughout this run. Even when he had to play a second season and attain many incentives requested by the Titans, he did that easily as well. Motivation ? Money of course. Did he help the Titans overall by actually showing up and doing his job ? Yes. Was he truly interested in the team ? No. That has come to light shiny and bright now. It's selfish, it's arrogant, and it's disgusting to watch.
Ok, has Coach Shanahan gone a bit too far with this conditioning test thing ? Probably. And that is only because he has blasted Albert in the media everyday. But to Mike's defense, did Albert not do the same thing to the Redskin organization ? He pretty much spit in the coaches face, Snyder's face, and his teammates face. Almost seems like he doesn't care. What he isn't understanding is that everyone is moving on without him. Although the team would like to have him, it's clear by some of his teammates responses they are working and preparing as if he is not going to be there. Seriously, Albert can pass the test if he wants to. I've seen guys with less ability do it year after year. No excuse. This isn't about the test, it's about Albert and yet another example of entitlement, and him thinking the world owes him something.
Think about it, he plays his way to a huge contract. He is being sued, he had an affair, the woman is pregnant or whatever, he complains about the defense changing and that the Redskins lied to him. Word ? Clearly he has not taken notice that the NFL is full of lies. Of course they will tell you what you want to hear in order to sign you. Catch is, once you're under contract that organization owns you. Especially for that amount of money. The other side of that is the black ball effect. He has been defiant of the change the organization is making. What happen to showing everyone you have changed Albert ? That it's not about the money ? That was all a lie, and part of your politically correct scandal to get paid. You're not interested in winning a championship, if that were true he'd still be in Tennessee.
Coming off of the 2003 year, I had 7 INT's which was the best year of my career. Dom Capers wanted to move me to safety to have more athleticism on the field. Now, I could have thrown a fit and made a spectacle out of it, but I didn't. Because it's not about me. It was about the team, and doing my part to help us get better. Nothing more.So I made the move. Does it mean I liked it or felt indifferent about the situation ? No, it doesn't. I was only one small part of the over all goal. Individual pride has a small place in team sports. Very small. Doesn't matter how much money you make, or how talented you are, when it comes down to it, the team comes first.
This is a much deeper issue that only Albert can figure out. Something inside of him that gives him the idea or justifies that he can act this way. All players want to achieve individual success, that is what makes some greater than others. Not to the point where it comes before teammates. He has to take an introspective point of view. He really needs to decide if this is what he wants to do. Right now he seems a little confused at life. So me personally I'm not gonna pass judgment on him, It's not my place. He does need to nip this in the bud quickly and save face for himself. The team will move on, the organization will move on and he will be forgotten. He will only be brought up in conversations of those that got paid and quit. So Albert, is that what you want your legacy to be ? A failure, a quitter.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)